For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. This page is also available as Markdown.

Risk appetite and ratings

Define dollar thresholds and choose the statistic that turns simulation output into Low, Moderate, High, or Critical ratings.

Simulation output is a distribution; decision makers want a rating. The risk appetite bridges the two: you choose a statistic to rate against and dollar thresholds, and every result gets a Low, Moderate, High, or Critical badge.

Configuring the workspace appetite

Go to Settings > Workspace > Risk appetite.

Rate against

Choose which statistic is compared to the thresholds:

  • Expected annual loss (mean)

  • P90 loss (1 in 10 year)

  • P95 loss (1 in 20 year) (default)

  • P99 loss (1 in 100 year)

Rating against a tail percentile (the default P95) expresses "we care about bad years", while rating against the mean expresses "we care about the long-run average". Pick the one that matches how your organization talks about appetite.

Thresholds

Set the dollar levels where the rating steps up:

Rating
Default threshold

Low

below Moderate

Moderate at or above

$250,000

High at or above

$2,500,000

Critical at or above

$25,000,000

A live preview scale shows the bands as you type, and validation keeps the thresholds in order.

Per-scenario overrides

Some scenarios warrant their own appetite, for example a scenario scoped to a small subsidiary. In the scenario editor, switch Risk appetite from Inherit to Custom and enter Moderate, High, and Critical thresholds for that scenario alone.

Ratings appear on the results badge, in the scenario table, and in generated reports, so aligning thresholds with your organization's actual appetite statement pays off everywhere at once.

Last updated